The drumbeat to bring William Bradley to justice has only just begun. Although we face an uphill battle, as this NY Times article makes clear, nevertheless I feel confident that we as a nation will put this man in jail.
The death of Malcolm X, shot dead at the Audubon Ballroom in Upper Manhattan in 1965, never inflamed
the public imagination in the same way the assassinations of John F. Kennedy
and the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. did. But scholars have long believed
that a bungled investigation resulted in the imprisonment of the innocent and
allowed some of those responsible to go free. Over the decades, efforts to
reopen the case have failed.
Now a best-selling biography has helped to renew calls for a full investigation. But
this time they may well gain traction because the legal environment has
changed: prosecutors in the South have demonstrated that it is possible to
pursue and win cases that are decades old and, as a byproduct, they have made
the failures of the police in the civil rights era abundantly clear.
At the same time, news has emerged that the man long suspected of having fired the
shot that killed Malcolm X but who was never arrested is living in Newark under
a different name.
“Time is running out; these guys are very old,” said Abdur-Rahman Muhammad, a graduate student at Howard University who first published the identity of
the Newark man on his blog and was a source for the biography’s
author, Manning Marable. “I wanted justice to be done, and I knew that Dr.
Marable wanted justice to be done.”
The effort to reopen the case has attracted the attention of the
nation’s most persistent advocate of civil rights-era justice, Alvin Sykes of
Kansas City, Mo. Mr. Sykes was instrumental in the reopening of the
investigation into the killing of Emmett Till in Mississippi in 1955 and in
persuading Congress to allocate millions of dollars to the investigation of
civil rights cold cases. Mr. Sykes has asked both the Justice Department and, this
week, the New York State attorney general “to conduct the most comprehensive
and credible search by the government for the truth concerning Malcolm X’s
The cause has made for strange bedfellows: Ilyasah Shabazz, one of Malcolm X’s six
daughters, is supporting the call to reopen the case despite her objections to
the biography, which paints a bleak picture of her parents’ marriage. Leith
Mullings, the author’s widow, is also asking for a new investigation.
But it will be an uphill battle, partly because three men were convicted at the time,
meaning the case is potentially a hybrid of two separate areas of criminal law:
a civil rights cold case and a wrongful conviction.
Malcolm X, who became a patron saint of the black power movement and,
long after his death, an American icon, knew his life was in danger when he
took the stage at the Audubon Ballroom on Feb. 21, 1965. He had broken with the
Nation of Islam, which had branded him an enemy and a traitor. A week earlier,
his house had been firebombed. As he began to speak, a disturbance broke out in the audience, a smoke bomb went off, and gunmen opened fire.
ThomasHagan, a member of the Nation of Islam from New Jersey who was then 22, was arrested at the ballroom that day. The police investigated the crime scene for
four hours before the blood was mopped up and a planned dance began.
The police later picked up two more Nation of Islam members: Muhammad Abdul Aziz, then known as Norman 3X Butler; and Kahlil Islam, then Thomas 15X Johnson. Both of them had attended a mosque in Harlem. In his book, Dr. Marable says that the Nation of Islam would not have used men from Malcolm X’s own mosque to carry out the killing and that the assassins were from New Jersey.
Mr. Hagan confessed, but always maintained that the other two men were not involved. At the trial, he testified there were other conspirators, but refused to name
them. All three men were convicted, but the question of how high the conspiracy
went in the Nation of Islam hierarchy — who, in fact, ordered the killing — was
David Garrow, a historian and a King biographer, obtained and reviewed the Federal
Bureau of Investigation files on Malcolm X in the 1990s. He said it was
probable that reams of wiretaps of the Nation of Islam had never been combed
for clues. In 1980, the bureau said it had never investigated the
In the late 1970s, Mr. Hagan, also known as Talmadge X Hayer, finally identified his
accomplices in an affidavit as part of an unsuccessful effort to free Mr.
Butler and Mr. Johnson (all three men have since been paroled).
One of the names he gave was Willie X, whom William Kunstler, the civil rights lawyer who represented Mr. Johnson and Mr. Butler, determined was William Bradley. The others are dead or presumed dead. Dr. Marable wrote that Mr. Bradley, using a sawed-off shotgun, fired the fatal shot.
Mr. Bradley, an ex-convict now in his early 70s, is living in Newark under the name
Al-Mustafa Shabazz. (Police records list both names for him.) He is married to
Carolyn Kelley Shabazz, described by The Star-Ledger of Newark as a community leader and the owner of a boxing gym who gives away turkeys at Thanksgiving.
Mr. Shabazz served time for conspiracy, drug dealing and making “terroristic
threats,” according to records at the New Jersey Corrections Department, and
was released in 1998. Through his lawyer, J. Edward Waller, Mr. Shabazz has
denied any involvement in the assassination.
Mr. Sykes, who cautions that he has yet to personally see proof linking the name
Willie X to William Bradley, would like to see a joint investigation between
state and federal officials, but it is the Manhattan district attorney who has
jurisdiction over the case. Mr. Sykes said he would rather that other agencies were involved, because the Manhattan district attorney’s office investigated the killing in the first place.
But there are limitations on other agencies’ ability to investigate. For one, it is not
clear if the killing could be considered a civil rights crime because both the
perpetrators and the victims are black.
Mr. Garrow said the definition of a civil rights crime should not be too narrow.
“When a major civil rights leader is assassinated, I’d like the civil rights
division to be interested, regardless of the color of the gunman,” he said,
referring to the federal unit.
Some experts say the Justice Department’s participation is crucial
because the F.B.I. and the New York Police Department had Malcolm X under
surveillance at the time of his death, raising questions about whether law enforcement officials had knowledge beforehand of the assassination plot.
Still, the Justice Department may not have any jurisdiction, and the department has
only occasionally investigated without it — in 1998, for example, then-Attorney
General Janet Reno ordered a limited review of the King assassination after
pressure from the family and the public.
The New York attorney general may investigate only if asked by the Manhattan district attorney or thegovernor. But cases that are decades old are not easy to solve, said Doug Jones, a former United States attorney in Birmingham, Ala., who helped
prosecute the 16th Street Baptist Church bombing in which four girls died. “A
lot of people think witnesses come forward after so many years have passed,” he
said, “but they don’t